Tuesday, August 17, 2010

RE: Nitelight/Twitlight review

Date Aug 05, 2010 - 10:25:19
From Zenith
Subject: RE: Nitelight/Twitlight review

hmm. i dont believe there is an official twitlight. you should make it Well im glad you read it before i did so i didnt waste me time XD

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey - just read NIGHTLIGHT.
Overly silly, ridicule hyper-focused on Bella's self-absorbed, clumsy, grandiose, senile character. completely aimless, some jokes funny, most repetitive crappola. Not worth reading. (Harvard Lampoon). Under-critical of author's true flaws for the most part. I expected smarter jokes. Using a literary reference or mathematical jargon in a joke does not impress me. It's pedantic while the joke itself sucks. Don't waste your money. It was $10 for me with shipping.

Seriously, man, is there really a Twitlight?" Nitelight was too long and hyperfocused, not long enough also, since it never had any plot at all, and S Meyers actually did have interesting plot, eventually. Her last book, Breaking Dawn, was by far the best written. She used the word synchronicity wrong! It was hilarious. "The Volturi began moving forward in synchronicity! I believe the word is related to fate, connectedness, includes serendipity, everything occurs for a reason, etc

No comments:

Post a Comment